MELA member and Middle East comparativist, Jere Bacharach, made the case in a recent issue of MELA Notes,1 cogently I believe, that at a time when regional studies are under attack from a number of credible sources,2 the demand for their consolidation into international studies is a growing spectre.3 He opined further that librarians schooled in technological advances can begin to arrest this development by bolstering the academic study of the Middle East through advancing the emerging use of the Internet.
I would like to propose still another way MELA members can assist their academic colleagues to project a purposeful study of the Middle East. In this regard, I would like to make two points: There is a case to be made, obviously in greater detail and elsewhere, for the study of inter-regionalism. Secondly, I would like to provide some basic bibliographic information regarding relations between the Middle East and North Africa as one cultural-political region and Asia as another, in support of a general interest in inter-regionalism.
The apparent globalization of human affairs, whether in terms of trade, tourism, or political contacts, has resulted in an observation that regionalism has increased in frequency and importance, i.e., NAFTA, EU, ASEAN. I would put forth the argument that one neglected aspect of Middle Eastern studies has been an appreciation of inter-regional developments, i.e., some type of relationship between the Middle East/North Africa and another region of the world and beyond the dimension of Islam.4 I might add a functional qualification at this point: It matters not too much whether the Middle East is the initiator or the recipient of any activity detailed. Accordingly, there have been too few studies, I believe, by international relations or comparative politics specialists on relations between the Middle East/North Africa and Sub-Saharan Africa, Asia, or Latin America.
While I would not want to diminish the import of Professor Bacharach's message on either the general or specific level, I would caution those who would jump too quickly to modern technological methods of conducting basic research without the consideration of the expense of dispensing with the traditional approaches of gathering information and materials. Electronic databases and similarly collected sources are becoming increasingly more valuable to the researcher whether dealing with the Middle East or other subjects of interest. One such research tool, I would be quick to note, the bibliography, certainly can be made more accessible, arranged more easily, and stored more efficiently today. But, the initial range of search, the comprehensiveness of the citations, as well as basic coverage, must, by necessity at the initial stage, be performed by a more traditional application of effort. The researcher must be aware of the availability of sources in which relevant information is contained. Most serious researchers realize that an awareness of the totality of what has been published or delivered professionally will not be fully satisfied by reliance upon any single repository or a complete dependence on technology. Hence, the employment of the selective electronic media must be limited to its acceptance as a vehicle to assist in the mechanics of interpretation and not as a substitute for the generation of ideas.
For further consideration, one indication of the dearth in published concern of scholars and researchers for the connection between Asia and the Middle East/North Africa can be indicated by the availability of bibliographic materials. In this direction, I would point out what is already published or forthcoming to include:
One of the earliest and acknowledged best sources is the JIME [The Japanese Institute of Middle Eastern Economies] Review (July 1987-date; with no. 1 published in Spring 1988), published as a quarterly but distributed in an irregular number set system and a similarly irregular format. The series was first published in Tokyo by the Economic Research Institute for the Middle East in 1983 as the ERIME Review (vol. 1, no. 1, Autumn 1983) (ISSN 0289-6230). Other Asian-based journals with substantial portions appearing in English would include:
The Journal of Arabic, Islamic \& Middle Eastern Studies, no. 1(1993-date) (ISSN 1320-7199), published by the Centre for Arabic, Islamic and Middle Eastern Studies at the Deakin University, Malvern, Australia is another important journal.
Other source material, not collected in a thematic format such as presented above, would include the following brief listing. The citations are presented by dyadic regional descriptors with an Asian state appearing in the first place. The location is not meant to indicate a initiator-recipient relationship but is done merely to emphasize the Asian connection.
ASEAN (Association of Southeast Asian Nations)-Persian
Gulf War
1. "ASEAN im Lichte der
Golfkrise." Südostasien aktuell (Hamburg) 9, no. 5
(September
1990): 423-27.
Asia [Multiple States Represented]-Oman
2. Kechichian, Joseph A. Oman and the World: The
emergence of an independent foreign policy [Santa Monica,
CA]:
RAND Corp., [1995].
Asia-Persian Gulf-Labor
3. Addleton, J. "The Impact of the Gulf War on
Migration and Remitance in Asia and the Middle
East." International Migration 24, no. 4 (1991):
509-526.
4. Connell, J. "From Beyond the Gulf: The
implications of warfare for Asian Labour
Migration." Australian Geographer 23, no. 1
(1992): 44-50.
5. Maas, Citha D. "Südasiatische
Wanderarbeiter in der Golfregion: vom `Sozialen Underdog'
zum `Politischen Treibgut'?"
Asien
(Hamburg), no. 40 (July 1991): 65-79.
Asia-Persian Gulf War
6. Rubinstein, Alvin Z. "The Gulf
War and East Asian Security." Korea and World Affairs
(Seoul) 15,
no. 4 (Winter 1991): 662--79.
7. Tow, William T.
"Post-Cold War Security in East Asia." The Pacific
Review
(Oxford) 4, no. 2 (1991): 97-108.
8. U.S. House of
Representatives. Committee on Foreign Affairs. Subcommittee on
Asian and Pacific Affairs. Asian Response to
the Crisis in the Persian Gulf: Hearing. 101st Cong., 2d Sess.
Washington, DC: Government Printing
Office, 1991.
Australia-Persian Gulf War
9. Evans, Gareth. "The Gulf War:
Some policy viewpoints: Speech made by the Minister of
Foreign Affairs and Trade to the Senate
on 21 January 1991." Backgrounder (Canberra) 1, no. 34
(February
8, 1991): 3-8.
10. Leaver, Richard.
"Australia's Gulf Commitment: The End of Self-Reliance."
The
Pacific Review (Oxford) 4, no. 3 (1991):
233-40.
11. Malik, Jag Mohan. The
Gulf War: Australia's Role and Asian-Pacific Responses.
Canberra Papers on Strategy and Defence, no. 90.
Canberra: Strategic and Defence Studies. Centre,
1992.
12. Young,
Thomas-Durell. "Australia's Defence Planning After the Gulf
War."
The Pacific Review (Oxford) 4, no. 3 (1991):
222-32.
China, People's Republic of-Iraq-Arms
13. Shildo, Gil. "Third World Arms Exports to Iraq
Before and After the Gulf War" in The Gulf
Crisis and its Global Aftermath edited by Gad Barzilai
et
al.
231-249. London: Routledge, 1993.
China, People's Republic of-Israel
14. Shichor, Yitzhak. "Hide and
Seek: Sino-Israeli Relations in Perspective." Israel
Affairs 1, no. 2 (Winter 1994): 188-208.
China, People's Republic of-Persian Gulf War
15. Harris, Lillian Craig. "The
Gulf Crisis and China's Middle East Dilemma." The Pacific
Review (Oxford) 4, no. 2 (1991):
116-25.
16. Huo, Hwei-ling.
"Patterns of Behavior in China's Foreign Policy: The Gulf Crisis
and beyond." Asian Survey 32, no. 3 (March
1992): 263-76.
17. Jencks, Harlan W.
"Chinese Evaluations of `Desert Storm': Implications for the PRC
security." The Journal of East Asian
Affairs (Seoul) 6, no. 2 (Summer/Fall 1992):
447-77.
18. Malik, Jag Mohan.
"Peking's Response to the Gulf Crisis." Issues and
Studies
(Taipei) 27, no. 9 (September 1991): 107-28.
19. Shichor, Yitzhak.
"China and the Gulf Crisis: Escape from predicaments." {\it
Problems
of Communism 40, no. 6 (November/December
1991): 80-90.
20. Weggel, Oskar. "China:
ein Friedensstifter in Nahost? zür Sechsländerreise Li
Pengs."
China aktuell (Hamburg) 20
(July 1991): 434-42.
21. "China und der
Golfkrieg." China aktuell (Hamburg) 20 (January 1991):
25-30.
China, Republic of-Persian Gulf War
22. Wu, Jaushieh Joseph. "Lessons
Learned From the Persian Gulf War: Taipei's perspective."
Issues and Studies 28, no. 4 (April
1992): 83-103.
Hong Kong-Persian Gulf War
23. Jao, Y. C. "The Gulf Crisis and
the Hong Kong Economy." China News Analysis (Hong
Kong), no. 1422 (November 15, 1990):
1-9.
India-Oman
24. "Oman Foreign Affairs Minister
Visits India." India News 35, no. 6 (July 15, 1996): 5.
India-Palestine National Authority (PNA)
25. "Indian Representative Office Is Opened In
Gaza." India News 35, no. 6 (July
15, 1996): 5.
India-Persian Gulf War
26. Malik, Jag Mohan. "India's Response to the
Gulf Crisis: Implications for
Indian foreign policy." Asian Survey
31, no. 9 (September 1991): 847-61.
Japan-Persian Gulf War
27. Brown, Eugene. "Contending Paradigms of
Japan's International Role: Elite views of the Persian Gulf
Crisis."
Journal of Northeast Asian Studies 10, no. 1 (Spring
1991): 3-18.
28. Chuma, Kiyofuku. "The Choice Is
Clear: Diplomacy over force." Japan Quarterly 38, no. 2
(April-June 1991):
142-48.
29. Fic, Victor."The Japanese PKO Bill."
Asian Defence Journal (November 1992): 28-33.
30. Hartmann, Rudolf. "Japans Haltung im
Golfkonflikt." Asien, Afrika, Lateinamerika (Berlin) 19,
no. 6 (1991): 1064-68.
31. Ijiri, Kazuo. "Japan's Defeat
in the Gulf." Japan Echo (Tokyo) 18, no. 3
(Autumn 1991): 56-61.
32. Ito, Kenichi. "Japan's Limited
Contributions to a Legitimate War." Economic
Eye (Tokyo) 12, no. 2 (Summer 1991):
5-8.
33. Kishino, Hiroyuki. The Persian
Gulf Crisis and Japan's Role. IIGP Policy Paper. Tokyo:
International Institute for Global
Peace, 1990.
34. Kosaka, Masataka. "The Iraqi
Challenge to the World Order." Japan Echo (Tokyo) 18,
no. 1\ (Spring 1991): 6-13.
35. Maswood, Syed Javed. "Japan and
the Gulf War: Still searching for a role."
The Pacific Review (Oxford) 5, no. 2
(1992): 149-55.
36. Pohl, Manfred. "Die japanische
Streitkräfte in die Golfregion? Diskussion um
den 'Japanischen Ernstfall"' in
Militärimacht Japan? Sicherheitspolitik und
Streitkräfte,
edited by Heiz Eberhard Maul. 338-62. Gesellschaft für Natur-
und Völkerkunde Ostasien (OAG). Tokyo and
Munich: Iudicium Verlag, 1991.
37. Purrington, Courtney. "Tokyo's
Policy During the Gulf Crisis." Asian Survey 31, no. 4
(April 1991): 307-23.
38. "Tokyo's Policy Responses
During the Gulf War and the Impact of the `Iraqi Shock' on
Japan." Pacific Affair
(Vancouver) 65, no. 2 (Summer 1992): 161-81.
39. Tamamoto, Masaru. "Trial of an
Ideal: Japan's debate over the Gulf Crisis."
World Policy Journal 8, no. 1 (Winter
1990-1991): 89-106.
40. Yamane, Hiroko. "Le
Gouvernement Japonais en guerre contre le pacifisme
insulaire." Défense Nationale 47, no. 7
(July 1991): 65-74.
41. Yasuhiro, Nakasone. "The Gulf
Crisis and Japan: Reinterpreting the
constitution to deal with emergencies."
Japan Echo (Tokyo) 17, no. 4 (Winter 1990): 6-25.
42. Yoshihiko, Seki. "After the
Gulf War." Japan Echo (Tokyo) 18, no. 3 (Autumn
1991): 54-74.
Korea, Republic of-Persian Gulf War
43. Bridges, Brian J. E. "South Korea and the
Gulf Crisis." The Pacific Review 5, no. 2 (1992):
141-48.
New Zealand-Suez Crisis (1956)
44. Pfeiffer, Rolf. "New Zealand and the Suez Crisis of
1956." Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth History 21,
no. 1 (January 1993):
126-152.
Pakistan-Persian Gulf War
45. Hussain, M. "Gulf War: Impact on Pakistan."
Strategtic Perspectives 1, no. 1 (1991): 12-23.
1Jere L. Bacharach, "The State of Middle Eastern Studies in Institutions of Higher Education in the US", MELA Notes, no. 62 (Spring 1995): 1-4.
2Yvonne Y. Haddad, "Presidential Address 1990: Middle East Area Studies: Current Concerns and Future Directions", Middle East Studies Association Bulletin, 25 (July 1991): 1-13 and Rashid Khalidi, "Is There a Future for Middle East Studies? (1994 Presidential Address)" Middle East Studies Association Bulletin, 29 (July 1995): 1-6.
3Stanley J. Heginbotham, "Rethinking International Scholarship", Items, 48 (1994): 33-40.
4Islam, it may be said, is represented in the present international political system by the transnational character of the Organization of the Islamic Conference (OIC).